Public Watchdog.org

Court Upholds City’s “No” To The Stumphouse

02.28.17

Back on March 9 of last year, we published our post: “A Stump Is Not A Tree, A Shed Is Not A House.”

On February 9, Circuit Court Judge Celia Gamrath effectively agreed in upholding the decision of the City of Park Ridge Zoning Board of Appeals that the stumphouse at 916 N. Western Avenue doesn’t pass muster under the City’s Zoning Code. And she did so without even providing an Architectural Digest critique.

Although the City was victorious, neither side covered itself in glory.

The two City Building Department employees whose greasy fingerprints are all over this debacle – then-Building Administrator Lonnie Spires and then-Zoning Coordinator Ed Cage – would have been hard pressed to screw this up more than they did, assuming their mishandling of the situation was the product of mere negligence rather than some form of Chicago-style winking-and-nodding.

Fortunately, they departed the City for public-sector sinecures in other communities shortly after their Laurel & Hardy act here, so they’re somebody else’s problem now. And their asleep-at-the-wheel superior, Community Preservation & Development Director Jim Testin, followed about a year later. Call it addition by subtraction.

As we pointed out a year ago, this situation identified several flaws in the City’s permitting process that, hopefully, will be corrected under new CP&D chief Jim Brown – who should not wait for direction from the City Council before doing a forensic analysis of what went wrong and how to prevent it from happening again – starting with a BIG BOLD WARNING on every application for a building permit that says something along the lines of: “If it’s not in writing and signed by the appropriate City official it is not authorized or permitted.”

And it might not hurt to re-examine the Zoning Code’s definitions of terms like “deck,” “deck addition,” and any others that might have given aid, comfort or credibility to any of the stumphouse owners’ arguments. Because whether it cost $26,000 or $2.60, the stumphouse would have been an eyesore at even half its elevation – unless it was gracing the backyard of some hillbilly mansion down in Stickney or McCook.

Not surprisingly, the perpetrators of the stumphouse insist they did nothing wrong and that they were just innocently taking their cues from Laurel & Hardy. They also claim to be considering further legal options.

Whatever.

Meanwhile, we’d like to end this post with a Watchdog bark-out to Planner/Zoning Coordinator Howard Coppari, who was hired after Laurel (Spire) & Hardy (Cage) departed. Instead of chalking up this fiasco to their errors and looking the other way, Coppari investigated the stumphouse like a starving dog getting after a t-bone.

We normally don’t applaud people for just doing their jobs, but Coppari stepped up and did his after 3 others failed to do theirs.

Well done, Mr. Coppari!

To read or post comments, click on title.

4 comments so far

The permiting process may not have been the only flawed thing during recent days of past. It seems applications for developements may not have been reviewed with a careful eye but rather shuffeled through ciity processes with haste. But yes props to Howard a job well done..

I followed this story quite closely as I’m sure many did and came away thinking everyone on both sides looks stupid. That being said I didn’t believe a single word the homeowners had to say least of all the $26k price tag. Live, learn, and tear the damn thing down.

EDITOR’S NOTE: We thought two of the three City employees came across as stupid or worse.

The fact that somebody could think that building such a monstrosity in their back yard was reasonable shows how we need zoning and building codes, properly enforced, to protect the average resident from self-centered jerks.

The zoning code has to be revamped. Looking at the homes constructed over the last 15 years or so; there are homes that violate the zoning rules where the homeowners did not get an exemption or a variance for the changes that were made. Look at the houses constructed on Hamlin, Engle, Home, etc., and you will see zoning violations that were never remedied. Hopefully the new planning / zoning person will no longer rubber stamp any change requested!!!

EDITOR’S NOTE: Having dealt with Zoning Code violations before, we don’t believe you can conclude that certain homes “violate the zoning rules” just from looking at them.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(optional and not displayed)