Public Watchdog.org

The Watchdog’s Kibbles & Bits – Box 22

04.08.11

Mayor Vetoes 2011-12 Budget.  Wednesday night (April 6) Mayor Dave Schmidt wielded his veto pen to another City budget.  Unlike last year, however, Schmidt did not nuke the entire budget – he line-item vetoed a total of $650,000 in various expenditures, as he explained in his veto messageIn so doing, he claims to be able to reduce the property tax increase approved by the City Council and restore some essential City services.  And he did it with advice from our well-paid City Staff, which properly gives those staffers some ownership of the cuts they should have made when the budget was originally crafted.

We can’t wait to see what vetoed line items the Council will over-ride at the Council meeting on April 18, a couple of weeks before five of those aldermen walk off into the sunset.

Adios!  Speaking of aldermen walking off into the sunset, we note that Ald. Jim Allegretti (4th) appears to be wheeling and dealing all the way to the finish line.  A story in last week’s Park Ridge Herald-Advocate (“Park Ridge City Council: Hiring own prosecutor for city traffic cases could pay off,” March 29) identified Ald. Jim as the public official extending the “invitation” to attorneys Wayne Addis and Joel Greenberg to pitch the City Council on giving them a $78,000/year contract to prosecute DUIs and other traffic-ordinance violations for the City. 

The purported carrot: a larger share of the fines going into City coffers than are now coming in through such prosecutions being conducted by the Cook County State’s Attorney’s office. But guess what?  Nobody, including Addis and Greenberg themselves, could quantify with any degree of certainty how much more money the City would get – a deficiency properly noted by Alds. Joe Sweeney and Don Bach.  We hope better data is presented when this matter is next taken up by the Council at the April 25 COW meeting.

For those keeping score, Allegretti previously served as the Council “sponsor” of the ill-fated (fortunately) attempt to bring some I-294 billboards to the northwest corner of the City, as well as the more recent ill-fated (again, fortunately) attempt by Hoffman Homes to jam 20 condominium units into an area on Touhy Avenue zoned for 12.  

And Welcome!  This week’s H-A and Park Ridge Journal contain an essay by 5th Ward Ald.-elect Dan Knight about how the City’s budget process must improve.  

We concur wholeheartedly with Knight, as well as with 4th Ward Ald.-elect Sal Raspanti’s call for the implementation of zero-based budgeting instead of the lazy and cowardly just-add-x%-to-last-year’s-budget process that may be the bureaucrats’ and politicians’ dream but is also the taxpayers’ nightmare.

If Knight, Raspanti and 7th Ward Ald.-elect Marty Maloney (a fiscal hawk on the Park District Board the past 8 years) can enlist just one more like-minded alderman, perhaps we’ll finally see “fiscal responsibility” go from being an increasingly meaningless catch-phrase to a meaningful local governmental policy.

To read or post comments, click on title.

10 comments so far

Welcome, Dan Knight!

I thought you were Dan Knight.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Shirley, you jest.

No. And don’t call me Shirley.

Dan is not Shirley, but he may very well be Dave’s Mini-Me — his letter was, as near as I can tell, pretty much lifted word-for-word from Dave’s Budget veto message. I know Dave is enormously articulate — and what a lovely change that was! — but I hope Dan starts writing — and perhaps even thinking — for himself once he’s sworn in.

Trust me, Alderman-elect Knight has his own mind and has expressed it to me on a number of occasions. We often disagree, and I frequently come around to his way of thinking on a topic. I can say unequivocally that Mr. Knight wrote that by himself. No one should be surprised that we have similar views on the budget process. The fact we both agree it is broken and needs to be fixed should be viewed by taxpayers as a good thing.

Mr. Mayor:

If what you say is true I look forward to some wonderful confrontations between you an Mr. Knight at council meetings. After all, you love confrontations, right?? You will forgive me if I don’t hld my breath waitiung for that to happen!!

I confront bad government. That’s all. I don’t like having to do it, and I’m looking forward to the day when I no longer need to.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Four (4) regular practitioners of “bad government” are on their glide-path back toward “civilian” life, Mayor Dave, so that should make for fewer confrontations on that basis alone.

I’m not Dan Knight. I’m a 5th ward taxpayer.

EDITOR’S NOTE: No offense, FWT, but who said you were Dan Knight?

Dan Knight is A Fifth Ward Taxpayer. But apparently he is not THE 5th Ward Taxpayer.

“Wondering”, up at the top of the comments, said s/he thought I was Dan Knight.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(optional and not displayed)